A rather unexpected disaster sprang from a ‘slight’ risk the other day in Oklahoma, as several supercells erupted within an energetic warm sector ahead of a slowing cold front. While the northern cells produced hail as they drifted to the northeast then dissipated, the three southernmost cells merged to form a large, rapidly cycling storm (radar loop linked) that would drop 13 tornadoes in 90 minutes, including an EF3 that devastated the town of Cole and an EF2 that wrought extensive damage upon Shawnee. Sometimes called ‘mothership’ supercells for their impressive rotating cloud formations, these storms often form over the high plains where land surface homogeneity favors large near-laminar inflow regions. In contrast to the predictable linear paths of tornadoes within typical supercell or QLCS thunderstorms, these massive supercells produce tornadoes that revolve around a central vortex, fanning out on highly chaotic paths. The tornadogenesis is clearly top-down from the large parent vortex, and the wide inflow largely smooths the effects of any topographical heterogeneities.
Rather than belabor my land surface model with a scenario where tornadoes evolved independently of terrain, I want to draw comparisons to tornadic events in recent memory, specifically a pair of events in 2017 when I was just beginning my deep-dive into tornado modeling and prediction. First, on April 14th, a mothership supercell formed in the Texas Panhandle then parked near Dimmitt, cycling in place for three hours and spawning several tornadoes including a mile-wide EF3 wedge outside of town. This spectacular parent supercell made another appearance on this blog for its textbook bubbling outflow as observed by the GOES-16 satellite. Then, just two weeks later, Canton TX was besieged by an analogous storm, a massive rotating supercell that spawned a couple of long-track tornadoes (EF3 and EF4) that ground chaotically northward over the course of more than an hour. While these three examples will be further examined as top-end tornadic events, mega-supercells (is this a good term, or do we need even more prefixes?) that produce several tornadoes are vanishingly rare, responsible for roughly 1% of all recorded tornadoes in the last decade. Worth studying, certainly, but I believe they deserve their own category distinct from conventional supercells because their behavior is so uniquely unpredictable.